<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.llrx.com">
<channel>
 <title>LLRX.com - Bridy, Annemarie</title>
 <link>http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/1200/0</link>
 <description>Visiting Associate Professor&lt;br /&gt;University of Pittsburgh School of Law&lt;br /&gt;3900 Forbes Ave.&lt;br /&gt;Pittsburgh, PA 15260&lt;br /&gt;Tel: 412.624.2921&lt;br /&gt;abridy@pitt.edu&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Associate Professor&lt;br /&gt;University of Idaho College of Law&lt;br /&gt;PO Box 442321&lt;br /&gt;6th &amp;amp; Rayburn Sts.&lt;br /&gt;Moscow, ID 83844-2321&lt;br /&gt;Tel: 208.885.7056&lt;br /&gt;abridy@uidaho.edu&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uidaho.edu/law/faculty/annemariebridy&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Faculty Profile&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=630766&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Publications&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=25834807&amp;amp;trk=tab_proC:%%5CUsers%%5Cabridy%%5CDocuments%%5CCalifornia%%20Health%%20Care%%20Foundation%%20Consulting&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Linkedin&lt;/a&gt;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Copyrights, Fundamental Rights, and the Constitution</title>
 <link>http://www.llrx.com/features/copyrights-fundamental-rights-and-the-constitution.htm</link>
 <description>The recent Supreme Court decision, Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley &amp; Sons, addresses fair use and the “first sale” doctrine, upon whose protection libraries, used-book dealers, technology companies, consumer-goods retailers, and museums have long relied. Professor &lt;strong&gt;Annmarie Bridy&#039;s &lt;/strong&gt; commentary focuses on the position that intellectual property rights in general and copyrights in particular are important, and when their scope is circumscribed to ensure the existence of a robust public domain, they benefit society. However important IP rights are, though – and reasonable people disagree pretty vigorously about that – they are not fundamental in the Constitutional sense.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/1200">Bridy, Annemarie</category>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/804">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/856">Intellectual Property</category>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/876">Legal Research</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 14:15:00 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Decline of DVD-by-Mail, or Further Thoughts on the Digital Death of Copyright’s First Sale Doctrine</title>
 <link>http://www.llrx.com/features/declineofdvdbymail.htm</link>
 <description>&lt;strong&gt;Prof. Annemarie Bridy&lt;/strong&gt; comments on a dynamic new area of online copyright and licensing as she focuses on how Netflix is transitioning from an operating model that is clearly covered by an exception to copyright law to one that (very probably) requires permission for every content delivery. </description>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/1047">Legal Research</category>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/1200">Bridy, Annemarie</category>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/822">E-Commerce</category>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/406">Features</category>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/863">Internet Trends</category>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/884">Licensing</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 15:41:47 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Opening Government: On the Limits of FOIA and the Metaphor of Transparency</title>
 <link>http://www.llrx.com/features/foiatransparency.htm</link>
 <description>Professor &lt;strong&gt;Annmarie Bridy&lt;/strong&gt; discusses the use of “transparency” as a metaphor for openness in government, the use of FOIA as a mechanism for ensuring such openness, and the ways in which proponents of greater public involvement in policy-making may disserve the cause by focusing too single-mindedly on access to information and the right to know, both of which are operationalized through FOIA.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/1200">Bridy, Annemarie</category>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/406">Features</category>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/844">Freedom of Information</category>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/847">Government Resources</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2012 17:32:26 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;Stolen&quot; LinkedIn Profiles and the Misappropriation of Ideas </title>
 <link>http://www.llrx.com/features/linkedinprofiles.htm</link>
 <description>Within the context of the decline of the law tort of &quot;hot news&quot; misappropriation,  Professor &lt;strong&gt;Annemarie Bridy&lt;/strong&gt; discusses a recent Pennsylvania case in which the parties are fighting over ownership of a LinkedIn account containing the plaintiff’s profile and her professional connections. The defendant, the former employer, asserted a state law counterclaim for misappropriation of ideas.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/1054">Legal Technology</category>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/1200">Bridy, Annemarie</category>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/804">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/876">Legal Research</category>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/930">Technology Trends</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:00:33 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Digital Death of Copyright&#039;s First Sale Doctrine</title>
 <link>http://www.llrx.com/features/deathcopyrightfirstsale.htm</link>
 <description>An important copyright case won&#039;t be argued in the Supreme Court, which on October 3, 2011 declined to review Vernor v. Autodesk, a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision involving the applicability of copyright&#039;s first sale doctrine to transactions involving software and other digital information goods. Law professor &lt;strong&gt;Annmarie Bridy&lt;/strong&gt; discusses the wide reaching impact of the first sale doctrine, without which there would be no free market for used books, CDs, or DVDs, because the copyright owner&#039;s right of distribution would reach beyond the first sale, all the way down the stream of commerce.</description>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/1047">Legal Research</category>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/1200">Bridy, Annemarie</category>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/804">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/406">Features</category>
 <category domain="http://www.llrx.com/taxonomy/term/856">Intellectual Property</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 05:59:18 -0700</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
