Burney's Legal Tech Reviews: Of Mice and XP
By Brett Burney, Published on January 1, 2002
Welcome
to my Legal Tech Reviews. I'm excited
to begin this monthly column and I look forward to reviewing some great
products and discussing issues that are relevant to technology used in
legal environments.
This first month might seem a little lopsided towards Microsoft as I review
the new optical mice from Microsoft Hardware and the
discuss Windows XP. While I don't work for Microsoft
or anything, I do realize that anytime you discuss the great giant from
Redmond, it will directly touch the greater number of readers.
The Computer Mouse Comes of
Age
The computer mouse
was created in the dawn of the computing age as an efficient tool for
human/computer interaction. Unlike everything else in the world of technology,
the computer mouse has virtually kept the same design and function – a
mouse with two buttons, a tail, and a little rubber ball to move the cursor.
Perhaps its time to change that.
From the Old to the New
One of the most significant technologies for computer mice in the last
few years has revolved around the word “optical.” If you turn an old,
conventional computer mouse upside down, you’ll discover a small rubber
ball protruding from the bottom. When you use an older mouse, the ball
moves two rollers inside the mouse that translate the movements of the
mouse into corresponding movements of your pointer on your computer screen.
These movements are sent to the computer via the computer mouse’s “tail”
– the wire from the mouse to the computer.
No matter how careful you are in your computer mousing activities, the
old style rubber balls will eventually gather dust and gunk. This is remedied
only by the tedious process of removing the ball, cleaning it, and then
using Q-Tips to clean the rollers inside of the mouse. If the notion of
taking apart a piece of your computer is a frightening prospect, then
the newest offerings of Optical
Mice from Microsoft might just be your saving grace.
Optical Glory
I have been using
optical mice from Microsoft from the first month they were introduced
in 1998. Instead of a rubber ball to track the movement of your hand and
pointer, optical mice use a tiny digital camera inside the mouse to takes
“snapshots” of the surface that the mouse moves upon. The “cool” factor
is very prevalent with these new optical mice because in order for the
camera to take accurate pictures of the surface it’s moving on, a red
LED is used to light the surface and produces a nice red glow underneath
your hand. While the old rubber ball mice required a mouse pad to operate
properly, optical mice can operate on any kind of surface except those
that are very glossy or mirrored.
![]() |
One of the first optical mice that Microsoft released was the “IntelliMouse Explorer.” The mouse’s appearance was very odd and unconventional because of it’s unique shape to make it more ergonomic. While the IntelliMouse Explorer was indeed more comfortable for those of use who use a mouse all day long, it was only designed for right-handers. |
| For our fearless leftys, the IntelliMouse Optical was introduced with a symmetrical design which functions well for whichever hand you choose to use. |
![]() |
Most
of Microsoft’s optical mice feature two additional buttons besides the
normal two on top of the mouse. While some people might find these extra
buttons unnecessary, it really is a fantastic innovation. For example,
you can use the extra two buttons for the “back” and “forward” buttons
in your Internet browser. That way, instead of moving your mouse all the
way up to hit the back button in the browser’s upper left hand corner,
you can simply click the additional button on the mouse. And with the
newest version of Microsoft’s IntelliMouse Software, you can assign the
buttons different functions for different programs.
Last but not least, all of Microsoft’s optical mice feature a “wheel”
on the top of the mouse. This wheel can be moved up and down to scroll
through a document or Web page on your computer instead of clicking on
those little arrow buttons or slider bars.
New Additions to the Family
Microsoft’s optical mice have been very successful and once you use one,
you’ll never want to go back to a gunk-attracting conventional mouse.
Microsoft has improved upon their optical mouse line and introduced two
new additions to the mouse family. The first is an improved IntelliMouse
Explorer and the second is the Wireless
IntelliMouse Explorer.
The improved IntelliMouse Explorer is truly great. The earlier model was
only capable of taking 1,500 “pictures-per-second” of the surface the
mouse was moving upon. The new version can take upwards of 6,000 per second
with the improved IntelliEye
Optical Technology. I was able to tell the difference in accuracy
immediately after installing the mouse. The mouse reacts to my slightest
hand movements and I really appreciate that kind of responsiveness.
In addition, the improved IntelliMouse Explorer has a slimmer design than
the original model and it feels a lot better under my hand. My hand is
better supported which also adds to the accuracy of mouse movement. The
wheel feels a little more firmer to the touch and the whole mouse responds
perfectly to any action that I desire.
The brand new “Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer” is phenomenal – the freedom
of a computer mouse without wires and the accuracy of Microsoft’s IntelliEye
Optical Technology. Since the actual mouse is wireless, the body of the
mouse holds two AA batteries which adds only slightly to the weight of
the mouse. The mouse communicates with the computer by radio frequencies
via a small receiver base which connects to your computer's USB port.
Once installed, you simply press the “connect” button (on both the receiver
base and bottom of the mouse) to make sure the mouse and receiver base
are talking to each other. If you get any kind of interference with other
wireless products in your home such as a cordless phone, Microsoft included
a second radio frequency channel for the Wireless mouse that you can switch
to. You can use the mouse up to 6 feet away from the receiver base without
any problems.
The Wireless IntelliMouse Explorer has a very intelligent design with
slight “grooves” in the sides to provide a pinch grip for your thumb and
third or pinkie finger. Battery life should be great since Microsoft included
a sensor in the mouse that can tell when your hand is not laying on top
of the mouse. This allows the mouse to go into a power-saving mode until
you “wake it up” again for the next use.
Once You Go Optical, You’ll Never Go Back
If you haven’t figured it out already, I highly recommend trading in your
old computer mouse for an updated optical mouse. And while there are other
great companies like Logitech Inc. that produce optical mice, I’ve found
that the Microsoft models work best within the Windows environment.
The only major complaint from everyone I’ve read or talked to is the price
– Microsoft charges around $55 for the regular
IntelliMouse Explorer and $75 for the Wireless
model. But these are some great quality products and it still is Microsoft
so you’re almost expected to pay just a little more. I just happen to
think that it’s worth it.
Is the New Windows Worth the XPerience? – Looking at Windows XP from a Legal Perspective
In
the world of computers, the Windows operating system is the great common
denominator. With Windows booting up around 98% of the world’s computers,
everyone gets exposed to the OS
even if they’re a die-hard Apple fan or Linux user. Regardless of the
latest antitrust brouhaha and your personal feelings towards Microsoft,
Windows XP is here and its time to look at its usefulness for legal environments
A “Windows” to the Past
Many years ago on a PC far, far away, Microsoft released Windows 3.1 which
was based upon DOS.
In very simplistic terms, Microsoft placed graphical “windows” on the
underlying DOS to make computers a little easier to use and understand.
Windows became the GUI (graphical
user interface) on top of the
DOS kernel.
When Microsoft introduced Windows 95 to the computing world, the OS was
revolutionary but was still built upon trusty ol’ DOS. The same goes for
Windows 98. This is why Windows NT was introduced – Microsoft developed
a new OS kernel with NT which was much more stable and designed for computer
systems like network servers that needed to run for long periods of time
without presenting a problem.
Windows Me (which stands for “Millennium Edition”) was for the most part
a very fancy upgrade to Windows 98 and the DOS-based kernel.
Since Windows NT became so popular, mainly because of its stability and
reliability, Microsoft sort of converted the NT line into Windows 2000.
While NT was known mostly for computers in large networking environments,
Windows 2000 brought the stability of NT to the personal computer desktop.
This made many people happy, including myself. (For a great, short history
on Windows please visit
http://members.fortunecity.com/pcmuseum/windows.htm.)
|
Xciting Potential All that brings us to the “ultimate XPerience” of Windows XP. One of the reasons Microsoft went with “XP” for “experience” was because the past experiences with thier older operating systems showed Microsoft that users wanted the security, reliability, and stability of Windows NT, but they also wanted the cool multimedia features and gaming possibilities of Windows 95, 98, and Me. And that’s exactly what XP offers to the world of Windows. |
![]() |
Windows
98 (and 95 for that matter) was notorious for giving users the Blue
Screen of Death (BSOD) which reported an ominous error message and
froze up the computer, no matter what you were working on. With Windows
2000 and XP, Microsoft has done a fantastic job of keeping your computer
system stable when it encounters an unrecoverable problem. When I do get
an error in 2000 or XP (which is seldom), Windows usually just shuts down
the particular program that originated the problem and I’m free to continue
working on the computer without a dreadful BSOD that would require me
to reboot.
Now this isn’t to say that Windows XP couldn't cough up a hairball every
now and then. XP is not completely crash-proof, but the crashes are much
less likely.
Other major bonuses with Windows XP include the
faster boot-up time. This is another advantage of the DOS-less environment.
You don’t get the “instant-on” like on a Palm Pilot or anything, but boot-up
and re-boot time for a computer running Windows XP is slightly faster
which of course allows everyone to be slightly more productive! (Tongue
in cheek.)
On a quick side-note, being DOS-less means that those ancient DOS-based
programs may not function in Windows XP. For example, it is reported that
the old standby WordPerfect 5.1 will not operate in XP.
Activate or Die
The biggest bellyaching that I’ve heard surrounding the release of Windows
XP has been about the idea of “activation.”
Microsoft has always required users to register their copy of Windows
but using XP will require you to perform the additional task of “activating”
your copy. If you don’t do this within 30 days, the computer will lock
up until you provide an activation code that comes straight from computer
gods at Microsoft.
I was very leery of this process myself until I actually installed my
copy of Windows XP. The activation was quick and painless and I elected
not to send any additional personal information to Microsoft except for
my location as being the United States.
The whole process of “activation” is designed to thwart piracy of illegal
copies of Windows XP (although the technology has already been cracked).
While this is a good and noble reason to have legitimate users of XP jump
through another hoop, this also means that you can’t install your copy
of Windows XP on more than one laptop and desktop computer at a time.
And while this has angered a lot of people, this limitation has actually
been a staple of every End
User License Agreement (EULA) of Windows that people have agreed to
when they install Windows.
You’ll only have to face the activation game if you purchase individual
copies of Windows XP – volume licensing for XP works a little different.
Legal-Friendly Features
A great feature included in Windows XP that I believe will appeal to legal
professionals is ClearType.
For some time now, Bill Gates has led Microsoft on a quest
to make text on a computer screen more like text on paper. The latest
embodiment of this quest is the ClearType
technology - bundled in Windows XP.
ClearType is intended more for LCD
monitors - such as flat-panel displays and notebook PC screens. The
effect of ClearType is sort of hard to describe – one of those “you gotta
see it to believe it” sort of things. I would say that ClearType makes
text and fonts on your computer a little “fuzzy,” but I hesitate to use
that word since the text becomes so much easier to read and view. You
have to manually turn on the ClearType option in Windows XP, but once
you do, you’ll never switch back to the “standard” typeface scheme.
If you are a legal professional that spends large amounts of your time
staring at your computer screen all day, the ClearType feature in Windows
XP will make your eyes dance with joy.
The other feature of Windows XP that I would focus on from a legal perspective
would just be the already discussed stability of the OS. As more law firms
and legal organizations incorporate the use of e-mail, Internet, instant
messaging, and even video-conferencing into their cyber-repertoire, the
underlying OS must be rock-solid.
Is There an Upgrade in Your Future?
Everyone wants to know if it is necessary to upgrade to Windows XP. The
answer, of course, as I learned in law school, is “it depends.”
You probably haven’t seen anything in my column here or anywhere else
that spurs to jump up and purchase XP immediately, and that’s ok. My general
rule of thumb is that if you’re in a legal environment, you will at least
need the stability (and peace of mind) of Windows 2000. This isn’t to
say that a law firm can’t function with Windows 98, it’s just that they’ll
have to dedicate more man-power to hunting down those BSODs when they
happen. I’ve been using Windows 2000 for quite some time now and I’ll
admit that I’m not quite ready to take the complete plunge into XP. On
the other hand, I would have serious digital withdrawal if I had to go
back to Windows 98 or Me.
The bottom line is that if you’re using Windows 2000 right now, you can
feel confident in staying right there until you do a major upgrade on
your computer hardware. If you’re using Windows 98 or Me, I would seriously
recommend upgrading - either to Windows 2000 or jumping all the way up
to XP.
Lastly, I would be remiss if I didn’t mention that Windows XP is offered
in two different flavors – Home
and Professional.
(Microsoft has a
good page that outlines the differences in the two versions.)
The bottom line here is that they are basically the same package, it’s
just that Professional has some added security and networking tools that
an average computer user would probably never use. For office environments,
I would recommend the Professional version just because you never know
when those extra tools could come in handy. I run the Home version … on
my home computer.
While I don’t think that Windows XP lives up to the millions of dollars
that Microsoft spent on its marketing campaigns, XP is definitely a solid
step towards a better OS. No one can deny the stability benefits that
Windows XP brings to the table but many people can do without all the
so-called graphical improvements that Microsoft stuck into XP. And as
always, it’s a good rule of thumb to wait a few months after the release
of a major software application to make sure all the bugs get discovered
and fixed. Other than that, I wish you happy experiences with Windows
XP.
Questions, Suggestions or Comments for Brett
I
would like to reserve this last section of my monthly column for
"questions from the audience." I enjoy reading e-mails from all my readers
and I'm always happy to offer some legal-tech advice. Please feel free to
e-mail me (bburney@bburney.net)
any questions, suggestions, comments, or any helpful tips and tricks that
you might have relating to technology used in the practice of law. I'll
personally respond to your e-mails and then summarize our discussions for
everyone else in this section for my next column. I've found that if one
person has a tech-question, it's a sure bet that others do too.
Thanks for reading.



