Why the Law Often Doesnt Recognize Privacy and Data Security Harms
In the second article of a four part series, Daniel J. Solove explains how the law is struggling to deal with privacy and data security harms.
Daniel J. Solove is the John Marshall Harlan Research Professor of Law at George Washington University Law School, the founder of TeachPrivacy (http://www.teachprivacy.com/), a privacy/data security training company, and a Senior Policy Advisor at Hogan Lovells. He is the author of 9 books, including Understanding Privacy (http://understanding-privacy.com) and more than 50 articles.
Twitter @DanielSolove.
In the second article of a four part series, Daniel J. Solove explains how the law is struggling to deal with privacy and data security harms.
In his third article in a four part series, Daniel J. Solove explores two issues that frequently emerge in privacy and data security cases: (a) the future risk of harm; and (b) individual vs. social harm.
Daniel J. Solove is a Law professor at George Washington University Law School, an expert in information privacy law, and founder of TeachPrivacy, a privacy and security training company. In the first of a four part series, Prof. Solove’s article focuses on the ramifications of increasingly common instances of personal data theft or improper data disclosure, and the subsequent ramifications for those compromised.
In his fourth article in a four part series, Daniel J. Solove discusses how the law should handle privacy and security harms.