Author archives

Tanya Thomas is an information seeker, manager, disseminator, and literacy teacher who approaches research as purposeful poking and prying. Most recently, she was the Research and Instructional Technology Librarian for the Thurgood Marshall Law Library at the University of Maryland Carey School of Law, where she championed the use of educational technology; taught classes on technology in the practice of law and legal research; provided research and reference assistance; and managed the School's learning management system. Her career also includes librarian roles in court, law firm, and academic libraries and teaching roles (legal research and  information literacy courses) as an adjunct professor for the University of Maryland Global Campus and Kaplan University.  Tanya holds a MLS from the University of Maryland and a JD from Howard University School of Law. She is a member of the Hawaii Library Association (HLA), the Western Pacific Chapter of the American Association of Law Libraries (WestPac), and the American Association of Law Libraries (AALL).

Teaching Legal Research in the Generative AI Era: When Source Blindness and Source Erasure Collide (Part 2)

In Part 2 of her series on how Generative AI (GAI) has changed the dynamics of legal research, Tanya Thomas highlights how research used to encompass finding sources, evaluating them, synthesizing insights across multiple authorities, and reaching conclusions based on that synthesis. Now however, it means asking questions and accepting answers. Students have become consumers of information rather than investigators of it. They don’t develop the iterative thinking that characterizes skilled research—trying a search, evaluating results, refining the query, following unexpected leads, discovering connections, recognizing gaps, circling back to fill them. They simply ask and receive.

Subjects: AI, Communications, Education, Legal Education, Legal Profession, Legal Research, Legal Technology

Teaching Legal Research in the Generative AI Era: When Source Blindness and Source Erasure Collide (Part 1)

Tanya Thomas, Research and Instructional Technology Librarian, raises the argument that we are training a generation of lawyers who rarely engage with the raw materials of their profession, and are increasingly consuming only the processed, pre-digested, AI-synthesized versions. Students are suffering from what we might call source blindness, the inability to distinguish between fundamentally different types of sources, compounded by source erasure, where sources disappear behind AI-generated summaries.

Subjects: AI, Education, KM, Law Librarians, Legal Research, Legal Research Training, Legal Technology